Legal Opinion
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 27, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 00-0020PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal involves a dispute between two insurance companies, each of which provided both primary coverage and umbrella coverage that was potentially applicable to the same motor vehicle accident in which a passenger was injured. Pursuant to Ariz.
*120Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) section 20-1123.01(B)(1990), the primary policy covering the vehicle was first in line to pay for the injuries to the passenger. The issue on appeal is whether that same statutory provision mandates that the umbrella policy covering the vehicle must also be exhausted before reaching the separate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GilmoreArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Miller v. Westcor Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. v. Farm & City Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. LangreckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Old Republic Insurance Co. v. RLI Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- AMHS Insurance v. Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- AMERICAN FAMILY MUT. INS. v. Continental Cas.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.