Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 25, 2001No. CR-00-0155PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Johnny Earl Baker, appeals the circuit court's denial of his petition for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., challenging his 1998 conviction for distributing cocaine. Baker's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, by an unpublished memorandum. Baker v. State, 768 So.2d 1022 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999) (table).

On January 27, 2000, Baker filed a Rule 32 petition, alleging:

"(1) The court was without jurisdiction to render the judgment or to impose the sentence because the conviction was obtained by a violation of the protection against double jeopardy;
"(2)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Biddie v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ash v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Straughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API