Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1993No. CR-91-1882PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael Lancaster appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The uncontradicted facts, as alleged by the appellant, are as follows: The appellant pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court of Houston County to the unlawful possession of cocaine on May 20, 1986. He was conditionally sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, and a final sentencing hearing was scheduled for July 7, 1986. During the interim, the trial court was to decide whether the appellant would be granted probation. On May 20, the appellant was released on $10,000 bond.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ex Parte BoatwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API