Legal Opinion

Tatum v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 30, 1992No. CR 91-1297PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the summary denial of two Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P., petitions for post-conviction relief. The appellant challenges his two 1990 guilty plea convictions for robbery in the third degree. The circuit court denied the petitions without a response from the district attorney and without an evidentiary hearing. This judge was the same judge who accepted the petitioner's guilty pleas.

The appellant contends that he was given no notice, prior to the entry of his guilty pleas, of the State's intent to proceed against him as a habitual offender, and that he is therefore entitled to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bishop v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Cogman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Mashburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  4. Whitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API