Legal Opinion

Lovato v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2012No. S-11-0104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] The appellant, Andy Lee Lovato, entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession of methamphetamine. In this appeal, he claims the district court incorrectly concluded that his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article 1 section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution was not violated when he was seized by the police. Finding no error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Whether the district court erred when it concluded that the appellant's rights under the United States and Wyoming constitutions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Cameron Clayton Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Carl Wayne Allgier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Venegas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Tina D. Engdahl v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API