Venegas v. State

HILL, Justice.

[11] After being charged with driving while under the influence, Juan Carlos Valdez Venegas (Venegas) appeals a district court's denial of his motion to suppress based upon his contention that the officer's stop was based upon an improper anonymous informant. Additionally, Venegas asserts that there was insufficient evidence for a jury to convict him. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Venegas states three issues:

1. Whether the decision of the lower court to deny the motion to suppress of the *748defendant was in error, or constituted an abuse of discretion, and/or was arbitrary and capricious…