Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2019No. S-18-0143PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOMGAARDEN, Justice.

*223[¶1] A jury convicted Eric Richard Dixon of felony possession of marijuana and possession with intent to deliver. Mr. Dixon challenges his convictions by claiming the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his vehicle following a traffic stop, and when it admitted the State's rebuttal evidence concerning Colorado's medical marijuana law. Mr. Dixon also raises claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of defense counsel. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Mr. Dixon raises four…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Dennis Karl Klingbeil v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Dallas Clem Mitchell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Martin Alan Ridinger v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Charles Alfred Armajo v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API