Legal Opinion

Moss v. Griffith

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 30, 2020No. 4:17-cv-02251Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARTY MOSS, II, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-CV-2251-NAB ) CINDY GRIFFITH, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Petition of Marty Moss, II for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1.) The State has filed a response. (Doc. 14.) Petitioner did not file a reply and the time for doing so has passed. Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API