Legal Opinion

Otworth v. Bays

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1951No. 32366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Staker complains that the Common Pleas Court erred in allowing oral evidence to be introduced relative to the votes cast by the three absent voters; in making a finding of fact that the three absent-voter ballots were legally cast for Otworth; in finding that Otworth was duly elected to the office of township trustee; in not rendering final judgment for Staker; and in failing to render a judgment setting aside the election as to the second township trustee because of gross irregularity and illegal acts nullifying the election.

Owing to the view which this court takes of the matter, it will be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olson v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. La Follette v. KohleeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Harrison v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  4. Johnson v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Glenn v. GnauCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Leneghan v. Husted (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hitt v. TresslerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re the Election on the Issue of Zoning the Southeasterly Section of Swanton TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re Sugar Creek Local School DistrictPutnam County Court of Common Pleas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API