Legal Opinion

State ex rel. La Follette v. Kohlee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1930PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The question presented upon this ap-' peal is whether or not the complaint alleges facts sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to the relief prayed for in the *545complaint. It is not contended by the respondent that if the statutes, violation of which is alleged in the complaint, are valid enactments, the allegations of the complaint are not sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to the relief prayed for. The contention made by the respondent is that the statute isjvoid.and unconstitutional as applied to the governor because (a) the qualifications of the governor and the method by which he may be…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Nixon v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Newberry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. DeMille v. American Federation of Radio ArtistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Cohen v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Labor's Educational & Political Club-Independent v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API