Legal Opinion

Hitt v. Tressler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1983No. 82-221PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

As well as challenging the trial court’s determination upholding appellee’s election contest and the consequent remedy, appellant poses three arguments questioning the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction. It is axiomatic that courts will resolve questions of subject matter jurisdiction prior to determining the merits of a controversy. Therefore, it is to the jurisdictional questions that we first turn.

The appellant first argues that appellee did not follow the requirements of R.C. 3515.09. As a consequence, the trial court did not acquire jurisdiction over this dispute. Specifically,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mehling v. MooreheadOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Williams v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In re the Election on the Issue of Zoning the Southeasterly Section of Swanton TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Otworth v. BaysOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State ex rel. Corrigan v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. George Zilich v. Thomas Longo David Mack Nancy Marincic Rose Marie Lovano Joseph Suster Michael Abella and Wilhelm SpiegelbergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Ruehlmann v. LukenOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Maschari v. ToneOhio Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API