Bowman v. Melnick

Mr. Justice Young,

specially concurring.

Inasmuch as I now concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Holland to which I formerly dissented I deem it proper that I state the additional reasons that impel me to such concurrence.

The reasons assigned for the conclusion in that opinion are substantially the same as those given for a similar holding in the case of In re Haas Co. (Taylor v. Ziegenhagen), 131 Fed. 232, decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and in which the facts were almost identical with those in the case at bar.

From an investigation suggested by the case of Pueblo…