Legal Opinion

Bank of Phoenix City v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1916PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Lee Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Lum Duke. Action by Henry Taylor against the Bank of Phoenix City to recover for a deposit. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellee Taylor sued the appellant bank to recover a sum of money alleged to have been left on deposit with the bank. The witness Phelps testified that he had placed the money in question on deposit for the account of plaintiff, and in this he was corroborated by the witness Curetin. Plaintiff produced a passbook showing a credit in agreement with the testimony of these witnesses. Moses, who was cashier at the time, and his wife, who assisted in the work of the bank, the two being the only persons connected with the bank and present at the time, had both died before this suit was brought. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Alabama Great Soiitliern Railroad v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. St. Clair County v. BukacekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Dean v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API