Legal Opinion

Burnstein Ex Rel. Burnstein v. Jennings

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1942No. 45537PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

On December 9, 1930, Joe B. Tye, as county attorney of Marshall county, Iowa, caused to be filed in the district court of Marshall county, Iowa, a county attorney’s information in which Herman Burnstein was accused of having possession of and of selling obscene literature. On the same day Herman Burnstein appeared in open court and by his attorney entered a plea of guilty to the information. Time was waived and the court pronounced sentence as follows:

“The Defendant Herman Burnstein is adjudged guilty of the crime of having in his possession and selling obscene literature as charged in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Dawson v. SiskSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Preston v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BostwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. State v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. State v. CulpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. RandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. de Jesús de Morales v. RamírezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API