State v. Olson

I. The appellant insists that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, and that his motions, made at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the~ evidence, for a directed verdict of not guilty, should have been sustained. The evidence is uncontradicted that sales of -intoxicating liquor' were made in a place of business-, a- combined pool hall,- barber shop, and drinking place, on October 23; 1924. The appellant testified tfyat he had been the proprietor of the businéss conducted at the place prior to September 18, 1924, and that on that day he had sold the…