Legal Opinion

State v. Culp

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1976No. 7619SC247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying the jury foreman’s request that the court reporter read back all of the evidence. This assignment of error has no merit. We said in State v. Hatch, 21 N.C. App. 148, 149, 203 S.E. 2d 334 (1974), cert. denied 285 N.C. 375 (1975), that “ ... it is discretionary with the court to grant or refuse the jury’s request for a restatement of the evidence.” Here there is neither abuse of discretion nor misapprehension of the law by the trial court.

Defendant also contends that the trial court erred in requiring as a “Special…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. In Re NewbernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Burnstein Ex Rel. Burnstein v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. State v. SetzerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. PennellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Ray v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API