Legal Opinion

Mason v. Funderburk

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1969No. 5-4997PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff below, seeks reversal of a summary judgment, asserting error in the court’s finding that there was no genuine issue of material facts. We agree with the trial court that there were no genuine issues of fact as to some of the appellees; who were defendants below, but find that there are genuine issues of material facts as to others. In so holding, we -apply the well-established rules that the burden to show that there is no genuine issue of material fact is upon the moving party, that all doubts must be resolved against the judgment, that all…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API