Legal Opinion

Holtham v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1904No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Case by George Holtham against the city of Detroit for personal injuries caused by a defective sidewalk. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the court below for personal injuries resulting from a defective sidewalk in the city of Detroit. He did not, as required by section 2 of Act No. 463 of the Local Acts of 1895, serve a notice in writing upon the head of the law department of the city of Detroit. That section provides:

“No action shall be brought against said city, nor any of its boards, commissions, or officers, for any negligent injury, unless it be commenced within one year from the time when the injury was received, nor unless notice shall be given in writing, within three months from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Renackowsky v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Germaine v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Griswold v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lindley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Van Auken v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Locke v. PembrokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Wood & Selick, Inc. v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API