Legal Opinion

Carrick v. Sturtevant

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1925No. Civil No. 2268PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Gleorge W. Sturtevant, hereinafter called plaintiff, had for some months prior to the spring of 1920 been engaged in a study of the water resources available for the irrigation of the lands between the Agua Fria and the Hassayampa Rivers, north of the Buckeye Canal, in Maricopa county. During this time he had accumulated considerable data in regard thereto, and had made some preliminary surveys and estimates. He was a civil engineer of long standing, and with considerable experience in hydraulic and power development.

About February, 1920, he met A. A. Carrick and Frank J. Mangham, hereinafter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenstreet v. CheatumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Keyes Farm & Dairy Co. v. PrindleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Nations v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waddell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Miller Cattle Co. v. MatticeArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Coombs v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Kreig v. HammelsArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Miller Cattle Co. v. FrancisArizona Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API