Legal Opinion
C. E. Hood, Jr. v. Gordy Homes, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Duly Domesticated Under the Laws of the State of South Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1959No. 7795PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.
This is the plaintiff’s appeal from the District Judge’s grant of the defendant’s motion for involuntary dismissal of the suit, without prejudice. The plaintiff, C. E. Hood, Jr., sought to recover $25,-000.00 from the defendant, Gordy Homes, Inc., on the following contract: 1
“This Memorandum of Agreement made and concluded at Aiken, in the County of Aiken, in the State [of South Carolina], this 27th day of October, A. D. 1952, by and between Gordy Homes, Incorporated * * * and C. E. Hood, Jr. * * *
“Whereas, the execution and delivery of this Agreement has been directed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Smith v. BoydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Zorn v. SweetUtah Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. J. Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Vogt v. HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Theodore L. Mularz v. Greater Park City CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980