Legal Opinion

Wiley Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This is an action by plaintiff, a general contractor, to recover from defendant, a subcontractor’s bondsman, for the cost of materials supplied the subcontractor and for which judgment has been rendered against plaintiff and the judgment paid. The facts are these:

On May 20, 1949, plaintiff entered into a general contract with the Josephine county school district for the construction of a high school at Cave Junction, Oregon. On June 4, 1949, plaintiff awarded a subcontract in the nature of a written memorandum agreement to one Lawrence L. Tennison, dba Tennison Electric Co., whereby Tennison…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Fitzgerald v. NealOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pacific States Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Crowley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Fred Christensen, Inc. v. Hansen Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fry v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gilbert Pacific Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. GILBERT PACIFIC v. Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Department of Administrative Services v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API