Tatum v. Tatum
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). Counsel for respective parties say that, after a-diligent search, they have been able only to find two .cases directly bearing on the issues raised by the appeal.
Counsel for the defendants rely upon the case of Rumsey v. Sullivan, 150 N. Y. S. 287, 166 App. Div. 246, to sustain the decree. In that case the court said (quoting from syllabus):
“A wife who did not join in her husband’s conveyance of land could not, during his lifetime, enjoin his grantee from drilling for oil or gas on the land and removing or selling any,oil produced, since she cannot…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watson v. Wolff-Goldman Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Cherokee Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Smith v. HowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Rumsey v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Skelly Oil Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Lecroy v. Cook, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. Ashland Oil & Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- Quality Coal Company v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.