Legal Opinion

Moore v. State ex rel. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 8709PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom the "Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was an information, in the nature of a quo warranto, in the name of the State of Indiana, on the relation of Henry U. Johnson, Esq., Prosecuting Attorney of the 17th Judicial Circuit, as plaintiff, against Jacob S. Moore, John Moore, Alfred Moore, John M. Shaffer and William Paddock, as defendants. The information charged, in substance, that the appellants, the defendants below, were acting within this State as a corporation, under the assumed corporate name of the “ Wayne and Union Straight Line Turnpike Company,” without haying been legally incorporated; and judgment of ouster was…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Smelser v. Wayne & Union Straight Line Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Crawfordsville & Southwestern Turnpike Co. v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State ex rel. White v. St. Paul & Morristown Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State ex rel. Howard v. Crawfordsville & Shannondale Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API