State ex rel. Howard v. Crawfordsville & Shannondale Turnpike Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, in the name of the State, on the relation of Frank M. Howard, prosecuting attorney of the 22d Judicial Circuit, as plaintiff, against the Crawfordsville and Shannondale Turnpike Company, as defendant. The cause was put at issue and tried by the court, and, at the defendant’s request, the court made a special finding of the facts and stated its conclusion •of law thereon. Over the exception of the plaintiff’s relator to the court’s conclusion of law, judgment- was rendered thereon for the defendant.
In this court the only error relied upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cruzan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Robinson v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Schindler v. WestoverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Smelser v. Wayne & Union Straight Line Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
- State ex rel. Collings v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blair v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Chevra Bnai Israel Aushe Yanove und Motal v. Chevra Bikur Cholim Aushe Rodof SholemAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
- State ex rel. Long v. Brownstown & River Valley Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Scott v. United States Endowment & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1903