Smelser v. Wayne & Union Straight Line Turnpike Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the "Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
No question arises upon the pleadings. The argument of counsel is confined to the questions arising upon the ruling refusing a new trial. Without stating at length the pleadings, which are very voluminous, because of the great and needless particularity with which the appellant stated his matters of defence, we outline the important matters alleged by the contestants. The complaint was in three paragraphs; the answer in nine. The first paragraph of the complaint was upon a promissory note; the second and third sought 'a recovery for toll alleged to be due from the appellant. One of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullikin v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Baker v. NeffIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Nave v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Jackson Township v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- New Albany & Vincennes Plank Road Co. v. StallcupIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Center TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Jennings v. DarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Brickley v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Harwood v. MasqueletteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.