Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtis Ray Howard

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 2006No. 05-10469PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Curtis Howard appeals the district court’s ruling that the search of an apartment at which he had spent the night was constitutional because he was on probation and officers had probable cause to believe that he resided there. We hold that the evidence in this case was insufficient to establish probable cause and reverse the ruling of the district court.1

I. BACKGROUND

Curtis Ray Howard was convicted of bank robbery in 1996. On April 14, 2003, he was placed on supervised release, and Probation Officer Robert Aquino was assigned to monitor him. Howard’s release was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Motley v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Bennie Demetrius WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Lambert GrandberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. BorowyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Ronald Ray DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Anthony PedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API