Legal Opinion
Motley v. Parks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 2005No. 02-56648PublishedCited by 181 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge.
We took this case en banc to clarify a number of issues in this circuit surrounding parole-related searches. We hold that, before conducting a warrantless search pursuant to a properly imposed parole condition, law enforcement officers must have probable cause to believe that the parolee resides at the house to be searched. In this case, they did. We do not, however, decide whether law enforcement officers also need particularized suspicion of wrong-doing before conducting such a search because, while this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Brown v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Espinosa v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.