Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Ped
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2019No. 18-50179PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50179 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00775-JAK-1 ANTHONY LEE PED, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 9, 2019 Pasadena, California Filed November 15, 2019 Before: John B. Owens, Ryan D. Nelson, and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Miller 2 UNITED STATES V. PED SUMMARY * Criminal Law The panel affirmed Anthony Lee…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baerbel McKinney-drobnis v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. John MagdirilaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Malik NgumeziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Magana-Magana v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.