Legal Opinion
Lane v. National Labor Relations Board. National Labor Relations Board v. Seamprufe, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1951No. 3928, 4075PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
The two cases involved in this proceeding were consolidated by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 203.33 (b) of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, and were so treated throughout the entire proceedings.
Number 3928.
In Number 3928, petitioner, Mavis Lane, petitions to set aside the Board’s order of April 14, 1949, directed against her. The Board seeks enforcement of its order.
The trial examiner found Mavis Lane innocent of unfair labor practices charged in the complaint and recommended that the proceedings be dismissed as to the Union for the reason that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Shawnee Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Irving Air Chute Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Barrus Construction Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seamprufe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma City General DriversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Joint Executive Board of Hotel & Restaurant EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.