Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma City General Drivers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1956No. 5262PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 F.2d 105
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
OKLAHOMA CITY GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS,
LOCAL UNION 886, International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and
Helpers of America, AFL, Respondent.
No. 5262.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
July 5, 1956.
Alice Andrews, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner.
Frank Grayson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for respondent.
1
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and ROGERS,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 501 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Radio Officers' Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, AFLCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Lummus Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Local 80, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Association of MacHinists Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 and Local Lodge 758, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Lummus Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964