Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Seamprufe, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1967No. 9155PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKEY, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board petitions this court for enforcement of its order entered against Seamprufe, Inc. for violation of Sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1), (3).
Respondent’s answer denies there is substantial evidence on the record, considered as a whole, to sustain the findings and conclusions on which the order is based.
Seamprufe has several plants located in Oklahoma and Arkansas. The violations charged herein are alleged to have occurred in its plant at McAllister, Oklahoma. In 1951 this court ordered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- J. C. Penney Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- American Sanitary Products Co., Also Doing Business as American School Supply Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Champa Linen Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Transport Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gold Spot Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Louisburg Sportswear Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007