Legal Opinion

State v. Compton

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1953No. 5486PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant has filed a motion for rehearing and upon consideration thereof, the opinion heretofore filed has been withdrawn and the one to follow is substituted therefor.

Opinion.

SADLER, Chief Justice.

The defendant asks us to reverse two convictions suffered by him in the district court of Grant County for the larceny of cattle, in the one case a heifer calf being the subject of the larceny and in the other a bull calf, both belonging to Victoria Land and Cattle Company. The two cases were based on different informations but were consolidated for purposes of trial, following which separate…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Lebeck v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. Ah Lee DoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People Ex Rel. Walker v. PateIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Thompson v. AndermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API