Legal Opinion

Wetmore v. Pattison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Marquette. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

. Graves, J.

On the 17th of May, 1878, the parties entered into a written contract by which Pattison for certain considerations therein stated agreed to furnish certain saw-logs to the plaintiffs. He furnished a part of the number but failed to supply the whole. It was part of the agreement of the plaintiffs that Pattison should not pay over fifty cents a thousand for towing, nor more than one dollar per thousand feet stumpage on any land owned by Lac la Belle Company, or the Marquette Lumber Company, or William L. Wetmore and Bay Furnace Company.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parmet Homes, Inc. v. Republic InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Rahm v. DeigIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Frederick v. HillebrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Rhea Thielens Implement Co. v. Racine Malleable & Wrought Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Dudley v. RapanosMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API