State ex rel. Tomino v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
To issue a writ of mandamus, we must determine that relator has a clear right to the relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the official act sought by relator, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 28, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E. 2d 225. Moreover, we will construe constitutions as well as statutes as necessary to discover whether the duty exists. See State, ex rel. Melvin, v. Sweeney (1950), 154 Ohio St. 223, 43 O.O. 36, 94 N.E. 2d 785.
The ordinance clearly requires…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Melvin v. SweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Taft v. CampanellaOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Brown v. BeardOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Ryan v. City Council of GahannaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Fattlar v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- LaSalle Bank Natl. Assn. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Grendell v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Citizens Word v. Canfield TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Taylor v. HerringOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.