Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Melvin v. Sweeney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1950No. 32428PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The questions before the court are whether the remedy of mandamus is available to the relator and, if so, when and under what circumstances may an elector be given assistance in marking his ballot.

The functions of the respondent, as Secretary of State, relating to the conduct of elections are prescribed by Sections 4785-6 and 4785-7, General Code.

Section 4785-6, General Code, reads as follows:

“The Secretary of State, by virtue of his office, shall be the chief election officer of the state, with such powers and duties relating to the registration of voters and the conduct of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ransom & Randolph Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. WickwireIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Elrod v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Fattlar v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Myles v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Skaggs v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API