Legal Opinion

Citizens Word v. Canfield Township

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2003No. Case No. 01 CA 197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vukovich, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Canfield Township and its duly elected trustees (collectively known as “township”) appeal from the judgment of the common pleas court granting a permanent injunction for plaintiff-appellee Citizens Word. The dispositive issue before this court is whether the township’s May 31, 2000 resolution violated Section 6, Article VIII of the Ohio Constitution. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether a township can expend its own monies on the installation of water lines on township property that will be used primarily by a private residential developer.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In re Appeal of Suspension of Huffer from Circleville High SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Al Johnson Construction Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation Board v. WithrowOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Grendell v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Energy Corp. v. DatkuliakOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Ebersole v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Ebersole v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Lawnfield Props., LLC v. City of MentorOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Crilley v. Lowellville Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API