Legal Opinion

State v. Sturgill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1996No. COA95-743PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The central issue on appeal is whether any remedy is available to defendant, who detrimentally relied on a police promise not to prosecute him, which promise was broken. In this case, the police promised defendant that he would not be prosecuted as an habitual felon if defendant gave information relevant to his involvement in five break-ins. Based on this offer, defendant provided police with self-incriminating statements pertinent to the break-ins. Subsequently, the State refused to honor the bargain. Defendant was indicted and con victed on five counts of breaking or entering…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. BergmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. State v. RoseboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. WackerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API