Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Markwell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1942No. 16,867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeVoss, C. J.

Appellee, Netta B. Markwell, filed her complaint in two paragraphs against appellants Clarence E. Hauser, Hazel Hauser, and Kenneth Porter to reform a written contract for the sale of real estate, for possession thereof, and for damages for the unlawful detention thereof. To this complaint the appellants Clarence E. Hauser and Hazel Hauser entered their separate appearances and filed a plea in abatement of said cause as to them. A demurrer to the plea in abatement was sustained by the court. Thereafter, appellants filed a separate demurrer to each paragraph of the complaint, which demurrer to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. NewkirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Johnson v. BeboutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Mullahy v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Miller v. CollierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Suess v. VogelgesangIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Witte v. WITTEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. WATERS v. Perfect Circle CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API