Legal Opinion

Witte v. WITTE

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1953No. 18,437PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKendall, C. J.

Appellees filed motion to dismiss or affirm this appeal for failure of appellant to comply with Rule 2-17 in the preparation of his brief.

Appellees contend that appellant’s brief is insufficient in that it does not set forth a concise statement of the record; neither does it contain a copy of the complaint or answer thereto, and that appellant has not shown a good faith effort to comply with said Rule. It is further pointed out that a narrative form of the evidence has failed to be set forth in appellant’s brief.

After a review of the appellant’s brief, consisting of eight and one-half pages,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Griffith v. FeltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Humphrey v. Pleasure Park CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Lake Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hauser v. MarkwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Loper v. STANDARD OIL COMPANYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Thanos v. FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Livingston, Admr. v. Livingston, TrusteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Coats Et Ux. v. Clanin Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API