Witte v. WITTE
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKendall, C. J.
Appellees filed motion to dismiss or affirm this appeal for failure of appellant to comply with Rule 2-17 in the preparation of his brief.
Appellees contend that appellant’s brief is insufficient in that it does not set forth a concise statement of the record; neither does it contain a copy of the complaint or answer thereto, and that appellant has not shown a good faith effort to comply with said Rule. It is further pointed out that a narrative form of the evidence has failed to be set forth in appellant’s brief.
After a review of the appellant’s brief, consisting of eight and one-half pages,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waggoner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith v. FeltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Humphrey v. Pleasure Park CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Lake Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Hauser v. MarkwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Loper v. STANDARD OIL COMPANYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Thanos v. FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
- Livingston, Admr. v. Livingston, TrusteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Coats Et Ux. v. Clanin Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.