Johnson v. Bebout
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Eush Circuit Court; John D. Megee, Judge. Action by Fred B. Johnson and another against Harter Bebout and another. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
Appellees take the position that appellants’ brief fails so materially to comply with the rules of this court that no question is presented for our consideration. An examination of the brief reveals that appellees are correct in such contention. The brief is materially defective in the following particulars: (1) It does not disclose what the judgment or the decree below was, as required by the third clause of Eule 22, or that a judgment or decree was rendered. (2) The brief does not contain “under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately num*160bered propositions or points, stated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Welch v. State, ex rel. BeauchampIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Ireland v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Zink v. ZinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Decker v. YoheIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Witte v. WITTEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Hauser v. MarkwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Mullahy v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Shay v. GoinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Ferdinand Railroad v. BretzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.