Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Newkirk
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Lawrence Circuit Court; 8. B. Loive, Special Judge. Action by James Newkirk against tbe Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $350, defendant appeals.
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Lawrence Circuit Court. Appellee asks that the appeal be dismissed, because under rule twenty-two of this court, the brief filed by appellant is insufficient to raise any question for decision.
1. The brief filed by the appellant fails in several particulars to comply with rule twenty-two. It does not state how the issues were decided, what the judgment or decree was, or the errors relied on for reversal; nor does it give under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately numbered propositions or points, stated concisely and without…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Chicago, Indiana & Eastern Railway Co. v. Wysor Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Albaugh Bros., Dover & Co. v. LynasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Hall v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- BOARD OF MED. REGIST. AND EXAM., ETC. v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Griffith v. FeltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hauser v. MarkwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Miller v. Berne Hardware Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Mullahy v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.