Legal Opinion

Baylis Bros. Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 1, 1968No. C.D. 3383PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The merchandise involved herein consists of smocked dress fronts imported from the Barbados, British West Indies. The dress fronts covered by protest 64/17889 were classified by the collector as ornamented wearing apparel, unfinished, in chief value of cotton, under paragraph 1529(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108. The smocked dress fronts covered by protest 65/4126 *337were classified, according to the statements contained in the respective briefs of the parties, as “wearing apparel in part of smocking,” in chief value of cotton, under item 382.03 of the Tariff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kayser & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. G. Hirsch Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  2. Zwicker Knitting Mills v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Colonial Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Excelsior Import Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Ferriswheel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API