Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
These are protests against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise described as broken face and rock face brick at $1.50 per thousand under paragraph 201(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as decorated brick. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable under said paragraph, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739, at 50 cents per thousand, as brick, not specially provided for, not glazed, enameled, painted, vitrified, ornamented, or decorated in any manner.
The pertinent provisions of the tariff act and said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Otagiri Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- United States v. Mutual China Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Todd & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
3Cited by19 opinions
- Baylis Bros. Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Brick, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Contractor's Brick & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Contractor's Brick & Supply v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.