United States v. Endicott Johnson Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge.
This appeal is from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 82 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 4787 (1979), sustaining appellee’s claim that the imported merchandise, stitched cotton shoe uppers, is properly *48classifiable as unomamented rather than, as ornamented textile articles. We affirm.
The Imported Merchandise
The involved merchandise comprises cotton canvas shoe uppers imported by appellee from Japan in 1972. The uppers were of both low-cut (oxford) and high-top construction. Two parallel rows of stitching extend across the eyelets nearest the user’s ankle to the midpoint of the arch area.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blairmoor Knitwear Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Baylis Bros. Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- The Baylis Brothers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Colonial Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ferriswheel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Jay-Arr Slimwear Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Gelmart Industries Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Nissho Iwai American Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.