Legal Opinion

Ferriswheel v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 21, 1980No. C.D. 4844; Court No. 77-8-02280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Chief Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for Customs duty purposes, of articles of Highland dress imported from Scotland. The articles include two men’s kilts made of wool, a Sheriffmuir jacket made from cotton, and an Argyll jacket fashioned from wool.

The wool garments were classified by the Customs officials under item 380,02 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), *63as modified by T.D. 68-9, as ornamented men’s wearing apparel, of wool. Accordingly, they were assessed with duty at the rate of 42.5 per centum ad valorem. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. Blairmoor Knitwear Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. International Spring Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. Ferriswheel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. L'Eggs Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Hampshire Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API