Legal Opinion

United States v. Spencer

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 15, 1991No. NMCM 90 2852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Senior Judge:

Appellant asserts, inter alia, that he received only 2 of the required 3 days credit for pretrial confinement, citing United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (C.M.A.1984). We agree.

Appellant served pretrial confinement from 3 to 5 January 1990. The military judge sentenced him on 9 February 1990. The parties agree that all officials at trial and afterward gave appellant 2 days of Allen credit. The Government argues that we should apply the various lines of cases interpreting the speedy trial and pretrial confinement law to resolve the issue before us. E.g., United States v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. TebsheranyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. WeddleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. DeLeonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  2. United States v. OliverUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  3. United States v. KershU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API