Legal Opinion
United States v. Kersh
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
Decided February 28, 1992No. NMCM No. 91 2144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REED, Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Government’s reply thereto.2
Appellant was tried on 20 March 1991 by a special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas, he was convicted of one specification of resisting apprehension (Charge I), one specification of assault (Charge II), and one specification of carrying a concealed weapon (Charge III), in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Articles 95, 128, and 134, 10 U.S.C. §§ 895, 928, and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to be confined for 100 days, to forfeit…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- Ruben Ortega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BrownUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. CaverNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. BellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004