Legal Opinion

Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1976No. 11742Published

1Opinion of the Court

548 P.2d 80 (1976)

97 Idaho 580

James E. and Martha BRIZENDINE, husband and wife, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents and Cross-Appellants,

v.

NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

No. 11742.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 26, 1976.

Rehearings Denied April 15, 1976.

Rehearings Denied April 22, 1976.

Craig L. Meadows and Gary Dean Babbitt, of Hawley, Troxell, Ennis & Hawley, William F. Ringert, of Anderson, Kaufman, Anderson & Ringert, Boise, for appellant.

John A. Rosholt, of Parry, Robertson, Daly & Larson, Twin Falls, amicus curiae.

Peter E. Heiser, Jr., of Kidwell &…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API