Legal Opinion
Montano Electrical Contractor v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 20, 2014No. 13-435CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
In this contract dispute, plaintiff Jose Montano, doing business as Montano Electrical Contractor (“Montano Electrical”), seeks payment from the United States (“the government”) for money allegedly owed for electrical work he performed as a subcontractor to a government contractor. Pending before the court is the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to RCFC…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Montiel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Taylor-Tillotson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Air-Sea Systems, LLC v. Grazel Foundation, LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Embrey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.