Legal Opinion

Municial Publications, Inc. v. Court of Common Pleas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1985No. 46 Misc. Docket 14PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

We have assumed jurisdiction of this matter to decide whether a judge should be disqualified from presiding over a hearing on a recusal motion raising factual allegations as to his impartiality which, if proven, would require his recusal, where the judge has personal knowledge of disputed facts and permits himself to be a crucial witness in the proceedings. We have concluded that, in such circumstances, a judge must recuse himself and the issue of impartiality must be litigated before and decided by another judge.

I

The instant appeal arises out of a libel action…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. GOODMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API