Municial Publications, Inc. v. Court of Common Pleas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
We have assumed jurisdiction of this matter to decide whether a judge should be disqualified from presiding over a hearing on a recusal motion raising factual allegations as to his impartiality which, if proven, would require his recusal, where the judge has personal knowledge of disputed facts and permits himself to be a crucial witness in the proceedings. We have concluded that, in such circumstances, a judge must recuse himself and the issue of impartiality must be litigated before and decided by another judge.
I
The instant appeal arises out of a libel action…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. GOODMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.